CVE-2026-98414

CVE-2026-98414

published October 14, 2026

CVSS
—
EPSS
0%
Percentile
10.2
In the wild
Unconfirmed
What it is

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

memcg: avoid charging the root memcg from obj_cgroup_charge_pages()

obj_cgroup_charge_pages() resolves the objcg to its memcg and calls

try_charge_memcg(), which does not short circuit the root memcg. That

memcg can be the root memcg: obj_cgroup_is_root() reflects the memcg the

objcg was created for and is never updated, while memcg_reparent_objcgs()

does redirect objcg->memcg to the parent on rmdir. An objcg of a dying

child of root therefore passes every obj_cgroup_is_root() filter but

resolves to the root memcg.

Folios keep the objcg they were charged with, so this is easy to reach

through zswap: allocate anon memory in a cgroup, move the task out, remove

the cgroup, then write to the root cgroup's memory.reclaim. The reclaimed

folios are charged through the reparented objcg and end up in

refill_stock() with the root memcg:

WARNING: mm/memcontrol.c:2198 at refill_stock+0x644/0x940

refill_stock+0x644/0x940

try_charge_memcg+0x12d6/0x1570

__obj_cgroup_charge+0x35/0xf0

obj_cgroup_charge+0x1de/0x210

obj_cgroup_charge_zswap+0x83/0x270

zswap_store+0x1620/0x2000

swap_writeout+0x94c/0x14c0

shrink_folio_list+0x3388/0x52b0

[...]

try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages+0x30d/0x830

user_proactive_reclaim+0x504/0x840

memory_reclaim+0x1f/0x30

Beyond the warning, the charge is asymmetric: obj_cgroup_uncharge_pages()

skips refill_stock() for the root memcg, so the root's page counter grows

and is never uncharged. It is not user visible, since memory.current is

not exposed on the root, but it is a leak.

Use try_charge(), which returns early for the root memcg, restoring the

symmetry with obj_cgroup_uncharge_pages().

The above sequence was scripted into a standalone reproducer (zswap on,

swap on a virtio disk, 512MB of anon memory faulted in inside a child of

the root cgroup, the task then migrated to the root cgroup, the child

removed, followed by "echo 600M swappiness=max > memory.reclaim" on the

root) and run in a CONFIG_DEBUG_VM=y VM. It reproduces the splat on the

first zswap store of a reparented folio, with the same call chain as the

report. With this patch applied the splat is gone while the zswap store

count over the run is unchanged, so the same path is still exercised.

cgroup selftests test_zswap, test_kmem and test_memcontrol show no new

failures.

The record
Technical detail
CVSS
Not scored
CVSS v4.0
Not supplied
EPSS
0.00206 · 10.2th percentile
Published
2026-10-14T18:17Z
References (3)
EPSS history
Timeline
  • 16 OCT 03:33Z
    EPSS moved — → 0%
    epss
  • 14 OCT 13:27Z
    memcg: avoid charging the root memcg from obj_cgroup_charge_pages()
    cvelistv5
  • 14 OCT 13:27Z
    memcg: avoid charging the root memcg from obj_cgroup_charge_pages()
    cvelistv5