CVE-2026-97985

CVE-2026-97985

published September 25, 2026

CVSS
—
EPSS
0%
Percentile
5.7
In the wild
Unconfirmed
What it is

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

af_unix: Update last skb marker in manage_oob().

Fahad Alharbi reported that blocking recv(MSG_PEEK) could hog CPU

due to OOB skb.

In the following cases, manage_oob() skips OOB skb(s) and returns

NULL for the last recv(MSG_PEEK):

socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, sk);

1) skb -> OOB skb -> NULL

send(sk[0], "ab", 2, MSG_OOB);

recv(sk[1], buf, 0, MSG_PEEK);

2) skb -> consumed OOB skb -> NULL

send(sk[0], "ab", 2, MSG_OOB);

recv(sk[1], buf, 1, MSG_OOB);

recv(sk[1], buf, 0, MSG_PEEK);

3) consumed OOB skb -> OOB skb -> NULL

send(sk[0], "a", 1, MSG_OOB);

recv(sk[1], buf, 0, MSG_OOB);

send(sk[0], "b", 1, MSG_OOB);

recv(sk[1], buf, 1, MSG_PEEK);

Then, @copied is 0 in unix_stream_read_generic() (zero-length buffer,

or non-OOB skb is not yet consumed), and unix_stream_data_wait() is

called.

However, it returns immediately because @last is not updated in

unix_stream_read_generic(), and the thread busy-waits for a new skb.

Let's update @last in manage_oob().

For MSG_PEEK, @last is updated with the skipped OOB, and for the

non-peek case, @last matches the returned value (when !copied)

because OOB is unlinked.

Note that manage_oob() is inlined and no stack canary is added.

The record
Technical detail
CVSS
Not scored
CVSS v4.0
Not supplied
EPSS
0.00168 · 5.7th percentile
Published
2026-09-25T15:17Z
References (5)
EPSS history
Timeline
  • 27 SEP 03:28Z
    EPSS moved — → 0%
    epss
  • 25 SEP 10:23Z
    af_unix: Update last skb marker in manage_oob().
    cvelistv5