CVE-2026-97764CWE-180

CVE-2026-97764

Low · published September 25, 2026

CVSS v3.1
3.7
EPSS
0%
Percentile
12.6
In the wild
Unconfirmed
What it is

django-allauth before 65.19.4 does not have the expected limits on failed login attempts because, in some common configurations, an attacker can leverage the handling of diacritics (e.g., accents) for a higher effective limit.

The record
Technical detail
CVSS v3.1
3.7 · LOW
Vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS v4.0
Not supplied
EPSS
0.00226 · 12.6th percentile
Weakness
CWE-180 · Incorrect Behavior Order: Validate Before Canonicalize
Published
2026-09-25T09:17Z
References (5)
https://codeberg.org/allauth/django-allauth/commit/4379e7931fe7572aacc4f3b4b5f2298d5f3ecc96 · [email protected]https://codeberg.org/allauth/django-allauth/commit/4e252aa2be7cef5d72d78049d6fb07cb27a89c83 · [email protected]https://codeberg.org/allauth/django-allauth/commit/ae472772c8f93bcb972205c9d7159051cf6f413a · [email protected]https://docs.allauth.org/en/latest/release-notes/recent.html · [email protected]https://pypi.org/project/django-allauth/ · [email protected]
EPSS history
Timeline
  • 26 SEP 03:27Z
    EPSS moved — → 0%
    epss
  • 25 SEP 04:25Z
    django-allauth before 65.19.4 does not have the expected limits on failed login attempts because, in some common configurations, an attacker can leverage the…
    cvelistv5