CVE-2026-97479

CVE-2026-97479

published September 24, 2026

CVSS
—
EPSS
0%
Percentile
5.8
In the wild
Unconfirmed
What it is

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

driver core: Avoid warning when removing a device while its supplier is unbinding

During driver removal, the following warning can appear:

WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 139 at drivers/base/core.c:1497 __device_links_no_driver+0xcc/0xfc

...

Call trace:

__device_links_no_driver+0xcc/0xfc (P)

device_links_driver_cleanup+0xa8/0xf0

device_release_driver_internal+0x208/0x23c

device_links_unbind_consumers+0xe0/0x108

device_release_driver_internal+0xec/0x23c

device_links_unbind_consumers+0xe0/0x108

device_release_driver_internal+0xec/0x23c

device_links_unbind_consumers+0xe0/0x108

device_release_driver_internal+0xec/0x23c

driver_detach+0xa0/0x12c

bus_remove_driver+0x6c/0xbc

driver_unregister+0x30/0x60

pci_unregister_driver+0x20/0x9c

lan966x_pci_driver_exit+0x18/0xa90 [lan966x_pci]

This warning is triggered when a consumer is removed because the links

status of its supplier is not DL_DEV_DRIVER_BOUND and the link flag

DL_FLAG_SYNC_STATE_ONLY is not set.

The topology in terms of consumers/suppliers used was the following

(consumer ---> supplier):

i2c -----------> OIC ----> PCI device

| ^

| |

+---> pinctrl ---+

When the PCI device is removed, the OIC (interrupt controller) has to be

removed. In order to remove the OIC, pinctrl and i2c need to be removed

and to remove pinctrl, i2c need to be removed. The removal order is:

1) i2c

2) pinctrl

3) OIC

4) PCI device

In details, the removal sequence is the following (with 0000:01:00.0 the

PCI device):

driver_detach: call device_release_driver_internal(0000:01:00.0)...

device_links_busy(0000:01:00.0):

links->status = DL_DEV_UNBINDING

device_links_unbind_consumers(0000:01:00.0):

0000:01:00.0--oic link->status = DL_STATE_SUPPLIER_UNBIND

call device_release_driver_internal(oic)...

device_links_busy(oic):

links->status = DL_DEV_UNBINDING

device_links_unbind_consumers(oic):

oic--pinctrl link->status = DL_STATE_SUPPLIER_UNBIND

call device_release_driver_internal(pinctrl)...

device_links_busy(pinctrl):

links->status = DL_DEV_UNBINDING

device_links_unbind_consumers(pinctrl):

pinctrl--i2c link->status = DL_STATE_SUPPLIER_UNBIND

call device_release_driver_internal(i2c)...

device_links_busy(i2c): links->status = DL_DEV_UNBINDING

__device_links_no_driver(i2c)...

pinctrl--i2c link->status is DL_STATE_SUPPLIER_UNBIND

oic--i2c link->status is DL_STATE_ACTIVE

oic--i2c link->supplier->links.status is DL_DEV_UNBINDING

The warning is triggered by the i2c removal because the OIC (supplier)

links status is not DL_DEV_DRIVER_BOUND. Its links status is indeed set

to DL_DEV_UNBINDING.

It is perfectly legit to have the links status set to DL_DEV_UNBINDING

in that case. Indeed we had started to unbind the OIC which triggered

the consumer unbinding and didn't finish yet when the i2c is unbound.

Avoid the warning when the supplier links status is set to

DL_DEV_UNBINDING and thus support this removal sequence without any

warnings.

The record
Technical detail
CVSS
Not scored
CVSS v4.0
Not supplied
EPSS
0.00168 · 5.8th percentile
Published
2026-09-24T21:17Z
References (4)
EPSS history
Timeline
  • 26 SEP 03:27Z
    EPSS moved — → 0%
    epss
  • 24 SEP 16:04Z
    driver core: Avoid warning when removing a device while its supplier is unbinding
    cvelistv5