CVE-2026-89518

CVE-2026-89518

published September 12, 2026

CVSS
—
EPSS
0%
Percentile
9.0
In the wild
Unconfirmed
What it is

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

sched_ext: Fix this_rq() assumptions in dispatch kfuncs

Under core scheduling, dispatch runs from within the core-wide pick and can

target a sibling rq, so ops.dispatch() may execute on a CPU different from

the dispatched rq's. Several kfunc paths assumed the two always coincide:

- scx_dsq_move() decided whether an rq lock is held by testing this_rq()'s

rq flags and lock-danced accordingly. A dispatch for a sibling took the

unlocked-context branch and acquired the source rq lock on top of the

already held dispatched rq lock which could deadlock.

- scx_bpf_sub_dispatch() dispatched this_rq() with its stashed

sub_dispatch_prev, which is NULL when dispatching for a sibling.

- finish_dispatch(), scx_bpf_dsq_reenq() and scx_bpf_dsq_nr_queued()

resolved SCX_DSQ_LOCAL to this CPU's local DSQ rather than the dispatched

rq's. The latter two are callable from other rq-locked operations too,

where SCX_DSQ_LOCAL now likewise resolves to the op's rq. This changes

behavior also without core scheduling, e.g. for ops.enqueue() running a

remote wakeup on the waking CPU, and is intended: which CPU happens to

execute an operation is incidental, the op's rq is what it is operating

on, and the resolution now matches the insert side where SCX_DSQ_LOCAL

dispatches land on the task's rq.

Use the rq tracked by scx_locked_rq(), which is set to the dispatched rq

around ops invocations and NULL in unlocked contexts.

The record
Technical detail
CVSS
Not scored
CVSS v4.0
Not supplied
EPSS
0.00198 · 9.0th percentile
Published
2026-09-12T00:19Z
References (2)
EPSS history
Timeline
  • 13 SEP 03:23Z
    EPSS moved — → 0%
    epss
  • 11 SEP 19:44Z
    sched_ext: Fix this_rq() assumptions in dispatch kfuncs
    cvelistv5