CVE-2026-74686

CVE-2026-74686

published August 22, 2026

CVSS
—
EPSS
0%
Percentile
14.3
In the wild
Unconfirmed
What it is

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

rqspinlock: Reset tail when preserving queue on deadlock

Currently, the destruction of the waiter queue is suppressed for

rqspinlock in cases where a deadlock is detected. Deadlock checks happen

relatively frequently (on entry for AA, within 1ms for ABBA), and waiter

threads may not be involved in locking scenarios involving deadlocks.

Thus, it is useful to not flush the queue and let other waiters take a

stab at acquiring the lock after we detect a deadlock and exit.

However, we need to follow the same logic as what we did previously for

the waitq_timeout label: reset the tail, and if we cannot, signal the

next waiter appropriately. In case of deadlocks, this signal would just

mark the MCS node as unlocked, and in case of timeouts, it would signal

RES_TIMEOUT_VAL. The difference thus is in the value propagated, which

decides whether the queue remains active or gets flushed.

Not doing the tail reset, and waiting for the next waiter can lead to

cases where we are the final waiter, and thus no next waiter arrives,

leading to intermittent stalls in this path. Once the next waiter does

join, we will be unblocked. In the theoretical case when the next waiter

never joins, we risk stalling indefinitely.

This can only happen for ABBA deadlocks, since entry into the wait queue

is guarded with AA checks. A precise sequence of executions leading up

to this scenario can be:

CPU 0 holds lock A.

CPU 1 holds lock B.

CPU 2 attempts lock B, becomes the pending waiter for B.

CPU 0 attempts lock B. B has locked+pending bits set, thus CPU 0 queues.

CPU 1 attempts lock A.

CPU 0 detects an ABBA deadlock.

Once deadlock detection happens for CPU 0, it will sit waiting for the

next waiter in the queue to populate node->next, which will experience

delays until such a waiter arrives.

Fix this by adjusting the logic for the check for deadlocks preceding

the waitq_timeout label. It would make sense to consolidate code for

both cases and use 'ret' to distinguish the value being propagated, but

that is left as an exercise for a future refactoring task to avoid diff

noise in this patch.

The record
Technical detail
CVSS
Not scored
CVSS v4.0
Not supplied
EPSS
0.00240 · 14.3th percentile
Published
2026-08-22T20:16Z
References (2)
EPSS history
Timeline
  • 22 AUG 15:32Z
    rqspinlock: Reset tail when preserving queue on deadlock
    cvelistv5