CVE-2026-45858

ext4: don't zero the entire extent if EXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1

published May 27, 2026

CVSS
—
EPSS
0%
Percentile
5.0
In the wild
Unconfirmed
What it is

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ext4: don't zero the entire extent if EXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1

When allocating initialized blocks from a large unwritten extent, or

when splitting an unwritten extent during end I/O and converting it to

initialized, there is currently a potential issue of stale data if the

extent needs to be split in the middle.

0 A B N

[UUUUUUUUUUUU] U: unwritten extent

[--DDDDDDDD--] D: valid data

|<- ->| ----> this range needs to be initialized

ext4_split_extent() first try to split this extent at B with

EXT4_EXT_DATA_ENTIRE_VALID1 and EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT flag set, but

ext4_split_extent_at() failed to split this extent due to temporary lack

of space. It zeroout B to N and mark the entire extent from 0 to N

as written.

0 A B N

[WWWWWWWWWWWW] W: written extent

[SSDDDDDDDDZZ] Z: zeroed, S: stale data

ext4_split_extent() then try to split this extent at A with

EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flag set. This time, it split successfully and left

a stale written extent from 0 to A.

0 A B N

[WW|WWWWWWWWWW]

[SS|DDDDDDDDZZ]

Fix this by pass EXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1 to ext4_split_extent_at()

when splitting at B, don't convert the entire extent to written and left

it as unwritten after zeroing out B to N. The remaining work is just

like the standard two-part split. ext4_split_extent() will pass the

EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flag when it calls ext4_split_extent_at() for the

second time, allowing it to properly handle the split. If the split is

successful, it will keep extent from 0 to A as unwritten.

The record
Technical detail
CVSS
Not scored
CVSS v4.0
Not supplied
EPSS
0.00162 · 5.0th percentile
Published
2026-05-27T12:15Z
EPSS history
Timeline
  • 27 MAY 12:15Z
    ext4: don't zero the entire extent if EXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1
    cvelistv5