CVE-2026-108126CWE-639

CVE-2026-108126

published October 15, 2026

CVSS
6.0
EPSS
0%
Percentile
28.1
In the wild
Unconfirmed
What it is

temporal-proxy 0.2.0 through 0.8.0 does not bind encrypted payloads to the namespace they were encrypted for. When payload encryption is enabled, the proxy chooses the decryption key by an identifier stored in the payload rather than by the namespace of the request, and nothing in the ciphertext records that namespace. A caller whom the proxy authorizes only for namespace B, and who has obtained an encrypted payload from namespace A, can therefore have the proxy decrypt it. In 0.8.0, the caller can submit the payload to the codec server's /decode endpoint. In every affected version, a caller who can also write to namespace B on the Temporal server directly can place the payload there and read it back through the proxy. This holds whether namespaces share the default key or each has its own, because a single proxy holds every key it is configured with. The issue does not give the attacker encrypted payloads they could not already obtain, and does not allow encrypted payloads to be modified.

The record
Technical detail
CVSS
6.0 · NONE
CVSS v4.0
6.0 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
EPSS
0.00356 · 28.1th percentile
Weakness
CWE-639 · Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
Published
2026-10-15T23:17Z
References (9)
EPSS history
Timeline
  • 17 OCT 03:28Z
    EPSS moved — → 0%
    epss
  • 15 OCT 19:09Z
    temporal-proxy payload decryption is not bound to the request namespace
    cvelistv5
  • 15 OCT 19:09Z
    temporal-proxy payload decryption is not bound to the request namespace
    cvelistv5