CVE-2025-37865

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fix -ENOENT when deleting VLANs and MST is unsupported

published May 9, 2025

CVSS
—
EPSS
0%
Percentile
20.2
In the wild
Unconfirmed
What it is

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fix -ENOENT when deleting VLANs and MST is unsupported

Russell King reports that on the ZII dev rev B, deleting a bridge VLAN

from a user port fails with -ENOENT:

https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/[email protected]/

This comes from mv88e6xxx_port_vlan_leave() -> mv88e6xxx_mst_put(),

which tries to find an MST entry in &chip->msts associated with the SID,

but fails and returns -ENOENT as such.

But we know that this chip does not support MST at all, so that is not

surprising. The question is why does the guard in mv88e6xxx_mst_put()

not exit early:

if (!sid)

return 0;

And the answer seems to be simple: the sid comes from vlan.sid which

supposedly was previously populated by mv88e6xxx_vtu_get().

But some chip->info->ops->vtu_getnext() implementations do not populate

vlan.sid, for example see mv88e6185_g1_vtu_getnext(). In that case,

later in mv88e6xxx_port_vlan_leave() we are using a garbage sid which is

just residual stack memory.

Testing for sid == 0 covers all cases of a non-bridge VLAN or a bridge

VLAN mapped to the default MSTI. For some chips, SID 0 is valid and

installed by mv88e6xxx_stu_setup(). A chip which does not support the

STU would implicitly only support mapping all VLANs to the default MSTI,

so although SID 0 is not valid, it would be sufficient, if we were to

zero-initialize the vlan structure, to fix the bug, due to the

coincidence that a test for vlan.sid == 0 already exists and leads to

the same (correct) behavior.

Another option which would be sufficient would be to add a test for

mv88e6xxx_has_stu() inside mv88e6xxx_mst_put(), symmetric to the one

which already exists in mv88e6xxx_mst_get(). But that placement means

the caller will have to dereference vlan.sid, which means it will access

uninitialized memory, which is not nice even if it ignores it later.

So we end up making both modifications, in order to not rely just on the

sid == 0 coincidence, but also to avoid having uninitialized structure

fields which might get temporarily accessed.

The record
Technical detail
CVSS
Not scored
CVSS v4.0
Not supplied
EPSS
0.00287 · 20.2th percentile
Published
2025-05-09T06:43Z
EPSS history
Timeline
  • 09 MAY 06:43Z
    net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fix -ENOENT when deleting VLANs and MST is unsupported
    cvelistv5