CVE-2024-26726

btrfs: don't drop extent_map for free space inode on write error

published April 3, 2024

CVSS
—
EPSS
0%
Percentile
16.6
In the wild
Unconfirmed
What it is

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: don't drop extent_map for free space inode on write error

While running the CI for an unrelated change I hit the following panic

with generic/648 on btrfs_holes_spacecache.

assertion failed: block_start != EXTENT_MAP_HOLE, in fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1385

------------[ cut here ]------------

kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1385!

invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI

CPU: 1 PID: 2695096 Comm: fsstress Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 6.8.0-rc2+ #1

RIP: 0010:__extent_writepage_io.constprop.0+0x4c1/0x5c0

Call Trace:

<TASK>

extent_write_cache_pages+0x2ac/0x8f0

extent_writepages+0x87/0x110

do_writepages+0xd5/0x1f0

filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x63/0x90

__filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x5c/0x80

btrfs_fdatawrite_range+0x1f/0x50

btrfs_write_out_cache+0x507/0x560

btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x32a/0x420

commit_cowonly_roots+0x21b/0x290

btrfs_commit_transaction+0x813/0x1360

btrfs_sync_file+0x51a/0x640

__x64_sys_fdatasync+0x52/0x90

do_syscall_64+0x9c/0x190

entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76

This happens because we fail to write out the free space cache in one

instance, come back around and attempt to write it again. However on

the second pass through we go to call btrfs_get_extent() on the inode to

get the extent mapping. Because this is a new block group, and with the

free space inode we always search the commit root to avoid deadlocking

with the tree, we find nothing and return a EXTENT_MAP_HOLE for the

requested range.

This happens because the first time we try to write the space cache out

we hit an error, and on an error we drop the extent mapping. This is

normal for normal files, but the free space cache inode is special. We

always expect the extent map to be correct. Thus the second time

through we end up with a bogus extent map.

Since we're deprecating this feature, the most straightforward way to

fix this is to simply skip dropping the extent map range for this failed

range.

I shortened the test by using error injection to stress the area to make

it easier to reproduce. With this patch in place we no longer panic

with my error injection test.

The record
Technical detail
CVSS
Not scored
CVSS v4.0
Not supplied
EPSS
0.00259 · 16.6th percentile
Published
2024-04-03T14:55Z
EPSS history
Timeline
  • 03 APR 14:55Z
    btrfs: don't drop extent_map for free space inode on write error
    cvelistv5