CVE-2020-13910

Pengutronix Barebox through v2020.05.0 has an out-of-bounds read in nfs_read_reply in net/nfs.c because a field of an incoming network packet is directly used…

published June 7, 2020

CVSS
—
EPSS
1%
Percentile
68.6
In the wild
Unconfirmed
What it is

⚠️ A surprising out-of-bounds read lurks in the Pengutronix Barebox, just waiting to mess with your network packets! 🌐 Think of this as a postal worker delivering a package that’s way too large for your mailbox—without checking if it fits first. When they just trust the label, chaos can ensue! 📦 This sneaky oversight could lead to unexpected behavior or even crashes in your system. While it's not currently known to be exploited, exposing sensitive data or creating instability is still a risky gamble!

Put simply

Think of this as a postal worker delivering a package that’s way too large for your mailbox—without checking if it fits first. When they just trust the label, chaos can ensue! 📦 The vulnerability arises from the `nfs_read_reply` function in `net/nfs.c`, where an incoming packet's field is used directly as a length without a bounds check, risking out-of-bounds reads.

What to do

This sneaky oversight could lead to unexpected behavior or even crashes in your system. While it's not currently known to be exploited, exposing sensitive data or creating instability is still a risky gamble! To stay safe, ensure you update your Pengutronix Barebox to the latest version post-2020.05.0. Staying vigilant and conducting regular code audits can also help catch such issues before they become a problem! 🛡️ You've got this! By staying proactive, you’ll keep your systems running smoothly and secure! 🚀

The record
Technical detail
CVSS
Not scored
CVSS v4.0
Not supplied
EPSS
0.01225 · 68.6th percentile
Published
2020-06-07T19:36Z
EPSS history
Timeline
  • 07 JUN 19:36Z
    Pengutronix Barebox through v2020.05.0 has an out-of-bounds read in nfs_read_reply in net/nfs.c because a field of an incoming network packet is directly used…
    cvelistv5