CVE-2020-11077CWE-444

HTTP Smuggling via Transfer-Encoding Header in Puma

Medium · published May 22, 2020

CVSS v3.1
6.8
EPSS
3%
Percentile
86.7
In the wild
Unconfirmed
What it is

In Puma (RubyGem) before 4.3.5 and 3.12.6, a client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via HTTP pipelining, the proxy may mistake it as the first request's body. Puma, however, would see it as two requests, and when processing the second request, send back a response that the proxy does not expect. If the proxy has reused the persistent connection to Puma to send another request for a different client, the second response from the first client will be sent to the second client. This is a similar but different vulnerability from CVE-2020-11076. The problem has been fixed in Puma 3.12.6 and Puma 4.3.5.

The record
Technical detail
CVSS v3.1
6.8 · MEDIUM
Vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
CVSS v4.0
Not supplied
EPSS
0.02877 · 86.7th percentile
Weakness
CWE-444 · Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
Published
2020-05-22T14:55Z
EPSS history
Timeline
  • 22 MAY 14:55Z
    HTTP Smuggling via Transfer-Encoding Header in Puma
    cvelistv5