CVE-2019-16785CWE-444

HTTP Request Smuggling: LF vs CRLF handling in Waitress

High · published December 20, 2019

CVSS v3.1
7.1
EPSS
3%
Percentile
84.8
In the wild
Unconfirmed
What it is

Waitress through version 1.3.1 implemented a "MAY" part of the RFC7230 which states: "Although the line terminator for the start-line and header fields is the sequence CRLF, a recipient MAY recognize a single LF as a line terminator and ignore any preceding CR." Unfortunately if a front-end server does not parse header fields with an LF the same way as it does those with a CRLF it can lead to the front-end and the back-end server parsing the same HTTP message in two different ways. This can lead to a potential for HTTP request smuggling/splitting whereby Waitress may see two requests while the front-end server only sees a single HTTP message. This issue is fixed in Waitress 1.4.0.

The record
Technical detail
CVSS v3.1
7.1 · HIGH
Vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS v4.0
Not supplied
EPSS
0.02537 · 84.8th percentile
Weakness
CWE-444 · Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
Published
2019-12-20T23:00Z
EPSS history
Timeline
  • 20 DEC 23:00Z
    HTTP Request Smuggling: LF vs CRLF handling in Waitress
    cvelistv5